Impact of a Web-Based Exercise and Nutritional Education Intervention in Patients Who Are Obese With Hypertension: Randomized Wait-List Controlled Trial

Background: Internet-based interventions are a promising strategy for promoting healthy lifestyle behaviors. These have a tremendous potential for delivering electronic health interventions in scalable and cost-effective ways. There is strong evidence that the use of these programs can lead to weight loss and can lower patients’ average blood pressure (BP) levels. So far, few studies have investigated the effects of internet-based programs on patients who are obese with hypertension (HTN). Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the short- and long-term efficacy, in terms of body composition and BP parameters, of a self-administered internet-based intervention involving different modules and learning techniques aimed at promoting lifestyle changes (both physical activity and healthy eating) in patients who are obese with HTN. Methods: A randomized wait-list controlled trial design was used. We recruited 105 adults with HTN who were overweight or obese and randomly assigned them to either a 3-month internet-based intervention group (n=55) or the wait-list control group (n=50). We assessed BMI (primary outcome), body fat mass (BFM), systolic (S)BP and diastolic (D)BP, blood glucose and insulin levels, physical activity levels, and functional capacity for aerobic exercise at Time 0 (preintervention) and Time 1 (postintervention). All the patients in the wait-list control group subsequently received the intervention, and a secondary within-group analysis, which also included these participants, was conducted at Time 2 (12-month follow-up). Results: A 2-way mixed analysis of covariance showed a significant decrease in BMI, BFM, and blood glucose at 3 months in the internet-based intervention group; the effect size for the BMI and BFM parameters was moderate to large, and there was also a borderline significant trend for DBP and insulin. These results were either maintained or improved upon at Time 2 and showed significant changes for BMI (mean difference −0.4, 95% CI −0.1 to −0.6; P=.005), BFM (mean difference −2.4, 95% CI −1.1 to −3.6; P<.001), DBP (mean difference −1.8, 95% CI −0.2 to −3.3; P=.03), and blood glucose (mean difference −2, 95% CI 0 to −4; P=.04). Conclusions: Implementation of our self-administered internet-based intervention, which involved different learning techniques aimed to promote lifestyle changes, resulted in positive short- and long-term health benefits in patients who are obese with HTN

Comparación de un programa de ejercicio intradiálisis frente a ejercicio domiciliario sobre capacidad física funcional y nivel de actividad física

Introducción: El ejercicio durante la hemodiálisis es beneficioso, aunque son pocas las unidades de hemodiálisis que ofrecen un programa de ejercicio adaptado a estos pacientes. Por ello es necesario encontrar alternativas más económicas para realizar ejercicio. El objetivo es comparar los efectos de un programa de ejercicio intradiálisis frente a ejercicio domiciliario, sobre la adherencia al programa, la capacidad física funcional y el nivel de actividad física. Métodos: 17 pacientes en hemodiálisis de un centro de Valencia fueron aleatorizados dividiéndoles en un grupo de ejercicio intradiálisis (n=9) y un grupo domiciliario (n=8). Ambos programas incluían ejercicio aeróbico y de fuerza durante 4 meses. Se valoró una amplia batería de pruebas funcionales (Short Physical Performance Battery, equilibrio monopodal, Timed Up and Go, Sit To Stand to sit test 10 y 60, dinamometría de mano, fuerza de tríceps, 6 minutos marcha) y dos cuestionarios de nivel de actividad física (Human Activity Profile y Physical Activity Scale for Elderly). Resultados: 2 pacientes del grupo intradiálisis y 5 pacientes de ejercicio domiciliario finalizaron el programa y fueron analizados. Se observó un efecto significativo del factor tiempo en el caso del Human Activity Profile (P<.017). En las pruebas funcionales no se encontró ninguna diferencia significativa. En cuanto a la adherencia al ejercicio los pacientes del grupo intradiálisis cumplieron el 92.7% y el grupo domiciliario el 68.7% del total de las sesiones. Conclusiones: En ambos grupos se observa un aumento del nivel de actividad física. Sin embargo, es necesario modificar factores, tanto en el personal sanitario como en los propios pacientes, para conseguir mayor adherencia a los programas de ejercicio

Comparison of intradialytic versus home-based exercise programs on physical functioning, physical activity level, adherence, and health-related quality of life: Pilot study

Intradialytic exercise (ID) programs are effective and safe for hemodialysis (HD) patients to avoid functional deterioration. However, exercise is not routinely undertaken in most HD units, and we do not know if home-based (HB) programs are as effective as ID programs. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of 16 weeks of ID exercise versus a HB exercise program for HD patients. A total of 46 patients were randomly assigned to the ID group (n = 24) or HB group (n = 22). They completed a 16-week combined exercise program 3 times/week. We measured physical activity level, physical functioning, depression level, and health-related quality of life at baseline and after 16 weeks. A significant time effect was found in both groups for the physical activity level (p = 0.012). There was also a significant group–time interaction effect for the one-leg standing test (OLST) (p = 0.049) and a significant time effect for the Short Physical Performance Battery (p = 0.013), timed up-and-go test (p = 0.005), sit-to-stand-10 (p = 0.027), right and left hand handgrip (p = 0.044, p < 0.001), one-heel left leg raise (p = 0.019), and 6-minute walking (p = 0.006), depression (p = 0.017). HRQoL remained unchanged. There was no difference between the two interventions on the tested outcomes (besides OLST). Both interventions were associated with positive changes of the physical activity levels and physical function.Proyectos de investigación y docencia 2017-2018 de la CEU-UCH (código beca IDOC17/19).4.380 JCR (2020) Q1, 17/72 Multidisciplinary Sciences1.240 SJR (2020) Q1, 10/135 MultidisciplinaryNo data IDR 2020UE